Nick wrote:
I'll likely be dismissed as being naive, but if the the discussion concerns the material which has been oversighted, rightfully or not, then there's not a great deal that can be discussed in public until those with access to the logs and material can make a decision as to whether or not the oversight tool has been abused, and if so, what impact that's had on anything. If there is material that was abusively oversighted and it can be presented in public, then I'm sure we'll see it, along with any other relevant information.
I am sure it will be widely discussed. I am going to refrain from discussing my own views of it right now because I am still deliberating.
But I am willing to say that some people who have been trolling about this case should be ashamed of themselves. Deeply ashamed.
--Jimbo