I don't think mav's idea is a bad one, if a little negative. It's certainly a possibility.
However, we could always just try and convince better candidates...The Committee to Conscript Michael Snow, anyone?
-- ambi
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:30:16 -0800 (PST), Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
--- Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
We need to be careful to not open more postions than there are reasonably well qualified candidates (of whom I count you as one). Some of the candidates in the last election seemed much more suited for the role of defendant than arbitrator.
I agree with this completely. Therefore votes against candidates should also be allowed - only the top candidates with a net positive vote will be elected (5 options would be given, from strongly approve to strongly disapprove). If that means that some seats remain empty, then so be it.
-- mav
Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l