Jeff Raymond schreef:
Mark Ryan wrote:
You don't think we should delete people's biographies upon request, where those people are of very marginal notability? Because apparently it's quite common for us to perform such deletions upon request nowadays, under WP:BLP or something.
No. I also disagree with the idea of "marginal" "notability" for Brandt.
IMHO, it's perfectly possible to make a good encyclopedia without a Daniel Brandt page. If his page was deleted because of his repeated demands, it would be bad. But we shouldn't just keep the page just because he's annoying us.
Yanksox should be blocked for vandalism and deadminned immediately, but that won't happen.
I may agree with this. It does seem to me to have been a move designed to be controversial, and to disrupt wikipedia to leave a departing message.
On the other hand, consensus seems to be that he's right, so... in view of AGF and IAR, ... let's just say this whole affair is simply NOT IMPORTANT ENOUGH to be upset about it.
Wikipedia's completely lost its way.
It's still a damn fine encyclopedia, with or without [[Daniel Brandt]].
Eugene