Right. And "trash" is more akin to speedy deletes, which is altogether different. AfD candidates are rarely hurting anyone; just out of place or against one or another content policy.
Looking at the huge number of articles on AfD that are unanimously deleted, I'm not sure how else to describe them other than "trash". These articles may not be as bad as speedy deletes (the decaying food that will cause a stench if not quickly removed), but that doesn't mean they should
be
kept. What we need is a process to efficiently remove articles that currently receive 100% support for deletion on AfD. If these articles no longer had to go through AfD, I think we probably could scrap the whole thing and send the volunteer garbagemen packing.
Carbonite _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I think this has a lot of potential to help with efficiently removing articles that currently receive 100% support for deletion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_reform/Proposals/Uncontested _deletions