Peter Ansell wrote:
On 18/02/2008, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/02/2008, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a thought. Perhaps the image can be collapsed, in the same manner we do our {{hat}} {{hab}} collapsible text blocks.
I'm pretty sure that's been suggested and rejected by many people. My main reason for rejecting it is the simple fact that it's impossible to fairly and neutrally determine which images should be hidden and which shouldn't.
"We cannot do everything perfectly" does not always lead to "we should never do anything".
There are pretty clear ideas about the first set of images which are more than trivially disputed. Editors can make neutral compromises instead of inserting their POV in under the guise of non-censorship as a start at least.
Peter
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Totally agree here. I don't even think censorship is the issue, as censoring would require making the photo unavailable.
./scream