Dammit Fred, I did do just that.
Cant find it on either the rejected or closed cases though. Have to dig up a diff:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration...
[Sigh] Stevertigo, Esq.
--- Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
Bring an arbitration BEFORE you start the edit warring.
Fred
On Nov 3, 2005, at 5:28 PM, steve v wrote:
Reddi has the notion that Iraq is a "sovereign
nation"
(see "suzerainty" ) and writes in a manner which revolves around this notion.
While WP:CITE is nice and all, the US government
and
all the bullshit that comes out of it is a big
caustic
problem for those of us who hold a more principled view of WP:CITE. In short, I need to see Reddi acknowledge is not sufficiently objective and lets
his
POV work its way into the article in various ways.
(I
can talk about them if you like). In short,
stating
that Iraq is sovereign is a violation of NPOV,
though
Reddi claims otherwise.
The weak-by-design Medcom wont intervene because "Reddi hasn't accepted Mediation," and the tough-by-design Arbcom doesnt think its an issue
until
I start arguing on the talk page, mass revert his edits, and start unblocking myself.
What to do? SV
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in
one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com