On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Bod Notbod wrote:
Put the character on a comics Wikia with all the desired information and have Wikipedia link to it. Presumably a Wikia on comics can establish its own reliable sources list to allow comic fan journals
We'd then have Wikipedia linking to something that's an unreliable source by Wikipedia standards.
If your desire is to overturn a central plank of Wikipedia policy - verifiability - then it would probably be wise not to present a "joke comic character" and a "fan fiction" dispute as plausible grounds to do so.
It's not a "fan fiction" dispute in the sense that you imply. It's about a published author claiming that there was a fan fiction dispute and being able to have only her side of the story on Wikipedia because the "fan fiction" author cannot publish her side in a reliable source.
If you really think it's unimportant because it's about fan fiction, then we shouldn't mention it at all. That's no excuse to mention one side.