Arbcom takes a lot of time to make quick and rash decisions. You hardly see extensive discussions by arbitrators on workshops or proposed decisions anymore
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Christiano Moreschi moreschiwikiman@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
I take it you object to the fact that "They give a lot of leeway to
long term trolls yet they do
not give a fraction of that to good standing users." Now, I agree, and
they should start banning
long-term trolls. Who, I wonder, would be first up against the wall
were that to happen?
I suspect quite a lot of users would agree that we should take a harder line on some people; however, I'm not sure that there is wide agreement on WHICH people. One person's troll is another person's unfairly maligned good user, I find.
Arbcom suffers from the well-known and far from unique problems of committees (slow to decide, cautious). However, being quick and rash isn't necessarily the right thing either.
-Matt
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l