Fwappler's own home page is unintelligible. I don't understand what he's trying to do with all the curly brackets, pipes and square brackets. Zoe tarquin tarquin@planetunreal.com wrote:Despite my reputation as a crabby old grouch (and me still in my 20s ... ), I do try and be nice to new users. But with Fwappler I've got to that hair-tearing point. Take a look at these pages:
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3APluralis_Majestatis http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk%3AFwappler
This person seems to completely misunderstand ANY attempt an explaining. Axel has already picked out two of their contributions as possibly crank-science. Am I wasting my time?
I mean, what ON EARTH do they mean by this exchange:
Me:
I removed "[[Phil Hartman|Bill McNeal]]" because it was a hidden link
I dind't understand. The reader sees one name but is taken to another.
Fwappler:
I understand now that if the reader "looks up" one name but is taken to another, then the distinction for instance between "[[Phil Hartman:acting as|Bill McNeal]]" and "[[time:portrayed by|duration]]" appears almost irretrievably concealed. Surely We wouldn't want /that/ -- thanks for the lesson.
gah???
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now