On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 09:45:18AM -0500, The Cunctator wrote:
I have to rise to Ed's defense. I have only seen Ed trying to make sure all sides of the story are represented. Presenting global warming as a scientifically proven "fact" is disengenous, dishonest, and unethical. It is a popular theory, yes. But it is also a controversial one. I have every confidence in Ed's neutrality.
Anthropogenic global warming, by the standard scientific definition of "fact", is a fact.
You didn't read the two URL's I cited, did you. And your "fact" is debatable. Indeed, myself and many others do debate it.
Jonathan