On 10/24/05, Anthony DiPierro wikispam@inbox.org wrote:
So deletion is the only solution to something that is low quality? I would think making it higher quality would also suffice.
yeah but I think we have fairly firmly established that that isn't happening.
Not at all. I'm an inclusionist, and I'd much rather have better articles than more articles. However 1) I think deletion is a waste of time that could be better spent improving articles, and 2) I don't think the two are mutually exclusive, I think you can have more articles *and* better articles. So please, if you're not an inclusionist, don't speak for us. That's called a strawman argument.
1)I can delete stuff at a rate of more than once a second
2)Errr that isn't happening.
3)It's called Reductio ad absurdum. The logical endpoint of the inclusionist position is to include everything.
-- geni