On 8/13/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 8/13/07, Sean sean@epoptic.com wrote:
Anthony wrote:
I've heard consensus defined as a majority....
I've heard that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Hearing it doesn't make it true.
... and a majority of the people who commented on AB's RfA, knowing that AB edited through Tor, suggested that AB should be an admin.
The majority were unaware of, or misunderstanding, or simply ignoring our policy.
That's ridiculous. If the majority of people don't support this supposed policy, then it's not a valid policy in the first place.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
No... it's "the majority of people... who commented on AB's RfA". I'm afraid RfAs aren't reasonable arenas for policy decisions. And I don't see many (if any) people arguing against NOP on NOP's talk page.