delirium at rufus.d2g.com posted the following to this list:
***BEGIN QUOTE*** Rick wrote:
So where is the Wikipedia jail? Right now, the accuseds are allowed to continue what they were doing, willy-nilly.
To summarize the matters currently under consideration: * Plautus Satire is currently temp-banned for a week pending a decision in his case, as Jimbo did so, and there was significant consensus that this should be done. ***END QUOTE***
My case? The only case I'm involved in that has reached mediation is my case against Curps. Curps has been harassing me and I have largely been trying to work around it, but it became to cumbersome so I sought assistance.
Curps is the defendant, I am the claimant.
Why is the process being ignored here?
Nobody has contacted me regarding anyone else's requests for mediation.
Why is the process being ignored here?
Curps announced his intention in the request I initiated involving his abuse.
The first version was titled "3 Curps v. Plautus satire"
The text follows:
***BEGIN QUOTE*** Curps v. Plautus satire I would like to request some outside intervention for a situation that has arisen. The user Curps seems intent on reversioning every edit I make, without explanation in the summaries or on talk pages. I've made several changes to entries recently, and all of them seem to have been reverted by Curps, so either he is watching the same pages I am, or watching my contributions, and reversioning them without explanation. I would like for somebody to epxlain to Curps that he needs to discuss reversions, especially if he is going around unmaking everything one user (me) does. - Plautus satire 01:32, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC) Curps reversions of Plautus satire as shown by page histories:[2][3][4][5] [6][7] ***END QUOTE***
I am reluctant to disclose the details of my attempts to get mediation with respect to Curps' abuse, because the other participants have demanded they remain secret.
Codie Vickers