On Dec 6, 2007 5:38 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 12:26 AM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
What prevarication? People have straightforwardly stated that !!'s block was not co-ordinated on the cyberstalking list. What is unclear?
I am someone who does not believe there has been significant prevarication beyond what Durova may have committed, and that even is conceivably not prevarication but merely very artfully telling the truth in a misleading way, rather than the real genuine prevarication of telling falsehoods.
But I do have to say that the way you yourself phrase that "straightforward" statement, leaves quite a few things not clear.
If not coördinated on the list, was the posting by Durova an impetus for private correspondance that though (due to its off-topicness) wasn't enacted on-list, nevertheless brought together or just simply in support individually with Durova a group of members of that list in an unofficial task force or whatever... these kind of questions are clearly not exhausted by the "straightforward" statements you mention.
What on earth would private correspondence have to do with the list, and how would anyone possibly know anyway?