On 3/1/07, Josh Gordon user.jpgordon@gmail.com wrote:
I will consider criticism of Essjay particularly valid when it is accompanied by a general call to eliminate pseudonymous editing of Wikipedia. The vast majority of editors on Wikipedia are anonymous, and I'm sure they have their various reasons, but anyone whose persona is not congruent with their real personality is doing exactly what Essjay did, on one level or another.
I don't expect a lot of support for this position, but it's the logical extension of the outcry against Essjay's charade.
I don't particularly feel like criticising Essjay on this point, having roleplayed various pseudonyms online for various reasons before. Caught a lot of socially dumb early hackers that way back in the day...
I will make two points, though:
One, as I've said before, it's easier to avoid some of the pseudonym problems if you just use your real name. I don't think there's any cause to abolish pseudonyms, but I do suggest that people reconsider using them. My opinion is that use of real names does not in fact bring any significant risk of real life consequences, and is simpler and ultimately better for you and the project.
Two, keep in mind that anything you do related to Wikipedia may now get viewed by a potentially hostile press and outside community.