Andrew Gray wrote:
Clearly you didn't get the memo. [[Wikipedia:Off-Wiki policy discussion considered harmful]] (Next up: someone to argue speeding laws don't count because they were passed by people who were stationary at the time.)
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
"Because "considered harmful" essays are, by their nature, so incendiary, they are counter-productive both in terms of encouraging open and intelligent debate, and in gathering support for the view they promote. In other words, "considered harmful" essays cause more harm than they do good."
"Typically, "considered harmful" essays gets written because someone has an axe to grind, and they feel like making that grinding process both public and dogmatic. This is a form of grandstanding, of course, but it is done with a purpose beyond simple publicity seeking. Usually such "considered harmful" essays are intended to draw attention to a little-known subject about which the author is passionate, or to highlight what the author feels to be a poor decision by someone else. In addition, there are those "considered harmful" essays that are written as part of a long-running argument that has gradually escalated."
(and yes, I put that on the wiki too)
- d.