-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Tony Sidaway wrote:
Alphax said:
I think there should be a request for undeletion on this.
I could reluctantly see that--if he's the first person to get into this kind of situation with Wikipedia, for instance. However I'm not sure it would be very ethical to undelete on those grounds. It seems too trollish to me (though I don't think you are proposing it for trollish reasons).
Did you read the pages...
David Gerard wrote:
Anthere (anthere9@yahoo.com) [050512 15:34]:
Just for the record, Mr Wollmann is still requesting removal of that information. I am not exactly sure what we should answer him now...
Probably not at all. Read these:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/index.html http://www.smbtech.com/ed/whyed.html
- d.
In the context of his relevance in the AUK article: not only has he won AUK's "kook of the month" award many times, and "kook of the millenium", he has also had an award named after him.
It is well known that he has threatened everyone who disagrees with him with legal action; it is alleged on the site mentioned above that he has caused *hundreds* of people's ISPs to cancel their accounts, based solely on the fact that he asked them to.
If the latter is true, it makes him one of the most influential people on the Internet (usenet anyway), comparable to Kibo and Sollog.
As for the undeletion, maybe wait until the court papers come :)
- -- Alphax GnuPG key: 0xF874C613 - http://tinyurl.com/8mpg9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis