It does not specify which part is fabricated. Even if the whole idea that wikification could be made compulsory for publication in the JBL is a fabrication, it is still a recommendation from one author. wikiquote and wikisophia seem to be the most appropriate venues.
"Scientia Potentia est" bibliomaniac_15@yahoo.com wrote in message news:557396.66605.qm@web62507.mail.re1.yahoo.com...
Read the blogpost more carefully.
--- On Thu, 1/15/09, brewhaha%40edmc.net brewhaha@edmc.net wrote: From: brewhaha%40edmc.net brewhaha@edmc.net Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Journal of Biblical Literature is also requiring aWikipedia entry To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Thursday, January 15, 2009, 9:53 PM
I do not think the encyclopedia is the best way to promote literature of this kind. The web? Sure. Everybody on the internet has publishing capacity on the web. The encyclopedia is for facts that are really not open to dispute. wikisources or wikimedia commons seem like more appropriate venues if not a USENET newsgroup, like alt.religion.*
"David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote in message news:fbad4e140901020504w67cf6cf9p76f59248b3cbe31a@mail.gmail.com...
http://ancienthebrewpoetry.typepad.com/ancient_hebrew_poetry/2009/01/new-gui...
Similar journals are apparently likely to do the same.
So. When will this become standard?
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l