On 24/09/2010 13:02, David Gerard wrote
But an encyclopedia with the semantic stuff actually being used - that'd be *interesting*.
For certain readers, heavy emphasis on "structured data" would exactly cover what they want: the world in an infobox. Of course many of said readers may be machines, and not signed up to PayPal. Readers' charter versus writers' charter? The things that WP actually has do sound more like the readers' charter: massive updates, articles that may be little more than "watch this space" but are at least there, hypertext surfing as a given of design (underestimated by people who assume articles are read through if at all). "Structured data" does little or nothing for writers' job satisfaction.
Charles