On 10/25/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/26/05, Anthony DiPierro wikispam@inbox.org wrote:
Can't be much worse than the current system. I've come to find that the
best
way to deal with the arb com is to ignore them. I can't think of a
single
good thing that has come out of the arb com, save those things that only needed to be resolved because the arb com existed in the first place. I don't think it matters very much who's on the arb com. The position
itself
is fundamentally flawed.
It deals with problem users who admins don't have the authority to deal with.
Which is exactly what I mean by "those things that only need to be resolved because the arb com exists in the first place."