Slim Virgiin wrote
Sorry, Charles, your examples are going to have to get hotter than that one. :-) An anon IP making a drive-by deletion isn't going to be affected by the contents of V. We need a concrete example of where V or NOR are causing the deletion of unsourced edits that are otherwise known to be accurate.
Talk:Johann Hari is worth reading (how do we know that Hari claims that the Dalai Lama called him 'fat'?).
This is said justification:
"The reason I deleted the schools list is because I couldn't see any proof for it; I have now e-mailed Hari and he has given me a list of his schools, so hopefully we now have consensus on that."
This is at least 50% wrong, as we know. What I say is that the lack of the basic 'due diligence' taken on 'proof' makes it in the region of 80% wrong.
I will make an effort to send something more confusing, next, as this is so trite to the experts. My years in academia did suggest starting at the beginning.
Charles