Oldak Quill wrote:
On 23/07/06, ScottL scott@mu.org wrote:
I have seen a number of cases where (usually as a way to resolve a protracted content dispute) all criticism or dissenting views are first segregated into a section on criticism and then later removed to a totally different article with no summary of that article left in the original.
This wouldn't be done with a "History" section, so shouldn't be done with a "Criticisms" section.
Ok good! :)
Dalf