On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:28:39 -0700, Dante Alighieri dalighieri@digitalgrapefruit.com gave utterance to the following:
At 08:10 AM 10/15/2003, Erik wrote:
At the point the logo was updated, there was virtually unanimous consensus that the Nohat variant was an improvement (20 in favor, 2 against). This satisfied the condition of the last stage of our contest, namely, optimization by consensus. As in all such consensus discussions, only interested parties participate. If you had looked around on Meta, you would have noticed that these discussions have been going on since Oct
What do you think where the variant submissions came from? The variant process was broadly advertised at least on the English Wikipedia.
That's all well and good. There's just one problem. The submission of logos was announced on the main page of the Wikipedia. The voting for logos was announced on the main page of the W. The second round of voting was announced on the main page of the W. The final selection was announced on the main page of the W.
Where was the revision process announced?
On the main page of the Wikipedia. Otherwise I woudn't have found it.