John Lee wrote:
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
I'm not really happy about "Further reading". Not only do some external links show films, or images (which don't require reading), it also fails to take into account that further reading is much thought about with regard to print sources and may lead to people being confused on where to put external links. And that's without mentioning the 800,000 articles that'd need changing.
Ditto Mgm. I'm not worried about the 800k articles we'd have to change - we got through categorising fine, didn't we?
Also, it's eminently bot-suitable. One of the first things Kate did on en: was run a bot to change "External link", "External Links" and "External Link" to "External links".
What I'm concerned about is that, as he said, external links != further reading. Maybe we could change "further reading" to "other resources"?
Or maybe we could leave it alone! I don't at all see the problem with "References" and "External links". (And some articles, e.g. [[Xenu]], actually have "References" and "Sources" and "External links".) I think the current convention is fine.
- d.