I sixth the ban. He has only made destructive contrabutions.
a.crossman@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:Hi,
Please see [[User talk:Viking/ban]]
User:Viking has been nominated for a ban by Mbecker, seconded by Wapcaplet, thirded by me, fourthed by Dante, fifthed by CGS. No opposition at the time of writing (except from Viking).
Actions include censorship of sex-related pages; totally false claims that he was a sysop, to intimidate users and make them stop criticising him; suggesting that the reason someone wanted to know the identity of his sysop account was so that they could hurt his children, and so on. General unpleasantness.
So I suppose we now need a ruling from on high. :-)
Thanks,