Ilya N. wrote:
On 3/31/06, uninvited@nerstrand.net uninvited@nerstrand.net wrote:
While I don't necessarily believe that Tyrenius should be an admin a this time, I do believe that he is justified in feeling unfairly treated by the project. The lack of consensus on a minimum number of edits, and the ever-growing minimum in the minds of many, is particularly a problem. We used to require 500 edits.
Hell, we used to not require any. Then it became 200, slowly up to 500, and now i think you can't even get a signle support vote unless you've had 2000 edits and an even spread across namespace (as some have been voting jokingly: "not enough portal talk edits")
I think this is becoming slightly ridiculous in some cases.
Note: today is April 2. Yesterday was April 1.