Would the effect of that be to guarantee that Wikipedia is the first result for just about everything, and nothing else could ever get close? ;-P I can't see them doing it, 'tho, because Wikilinks are just internal and don't really contribute to the 'relevance' of a particular result on the wider 'net.
On Dec 19, 2007 2:48 PM, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
Insufficient geekitude. References are just academic.
Someone needs to propose to Google that they auto-expand [[Wikilinks]] to Wikipedia URLs ;-)
-george
On Dec 19, 2007 8:46 AM, Nathan Awrich nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
You know you're a wikiholic when you add references to e-mails!
On Dec 19, 2007 11:16 AM, Charlotte Webb charlottethewebb@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/18/07, joshua.zelinsky@yale.edu joshua.zelinsky@yale.edu wrote:
Larry raises very good points. I think he overestimates how much people prefer quality to easy access but I might be cynical.
Ah, but cynicism is a virtue. Read-access is cake. Write-access, even to fix a minor grammatical error[1], is subject to excessive restriction.
On 12/18/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
That is pretty much what citizendium is relying on. That there is a "huge potential demand" for perfection instead of "just good enough". I don't see that this is a gimme, but it could be true. I cast my lot with "just good enough", so will have to forego perfection.
"I appreciate the best, but I'm settling for less, 'cause I'm looking for the next best thing."[2]
On 12/18/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, the flipside of the argument is that what wikipedia is trying is not waiting for a grand piano to appear out of thin air, but instead giving the parts of one grand piano to a million monkeys, and waiting patiently for the monkeys to assemble them into a playable instrument.
More like we rely on them to create their own list of parts and tools to scavenge for, and patiently wait for them assemble said piano.
Maybe the result will be perfectly tuned but look like shit. Or maybe it will be visually beautiful but sound like shit. Or maybe the instrument will look and sound great, but smell like shit. Or maybe it will look, sound, and smell like shit, but at least it won't cost us a penny. Nothing comes without a trade-off.
—C.W.
[1] (or any other issue, perhaps in the [[Rocket science]] article, which would not benefit much, if at all, from expertise or even vague comprehension of the subject) [2] (C) 1983 Zevon Music (BMI), Tiny Tunes (ASCAP), Valgovind Music (BMI)
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l