-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Stephen Streater wrote:
I disagree. Wikipedia is not about an organisation's view of itself, but the view of a disinterested observer.
Yeah, but this idea wouldn't involve using the school's own website to verify the organisation's POV assertions of itself (e.g. 'one of the most popular schools in the country') but for more mundane, relatively uncontested facts (e.g. 'at least one of the child's parents must be an adherent of the school's religion'). We do this already for corporations - - for example citing the company's official website as a source to confirm who the CEO is.
Cynical