Ian Woollard wrote:
On 17/02/2008, Screamer scream@datascreamer.com wrote:
Totally agree here. I don't even think censorship is the issue, as censoring would require making the photo unavailable.
I also don't think that moving material into different articles is inherently censorship; otherwise we would be technically censoring almost every time we move material around to form sub articles, but it's still available.
I believe we cannot in any conscience censor the *wikipedia* as a *whole*, but moving stuff around to articles where it is self-evident what is in them (a principle of least surprise) is a different issue. I do also feel *very* strongly indeed that removing wikilinks can very definitely be a form of censorship; if people can't easily find material.
./scream
I don't think this is the issue here. In my proposed compromise, the link is still there, you just have to click it.
./scream