Wouldn't that be running afoul of the "Citogenesis" problem that Randall Munroe so succinctly pointed out in his xkcd web comic:
Elias Max Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי elipongo@gmail.com "יְהִי אוֹר"
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:19 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 March 2014 18:04, Brian J Mingus brian.mingus@colorado.edu wrote:
The reason the name stuck is that "Baader-Meinhof" is a weird name, and
one
would not expect to see it multiple times independently in short
succession.
Hence the name "Baader-Meinhof phenomenon" (which is also the name of a book) is analogous to onomatopoeia in that both represent the thing they
are
describing in some way - this is also similar to homoiconicity. It's a perfect name - much better than "frequency illusion" - and a substantial number of people now know it by this name, in part due to its
longstanding
and interesting history of existence on Wikipedia, which has advertised
it
to hundreds of thousands of people and generated tens of thousands of websites which use it by that name. The article should clearly stay!
Now you just need sources to this effect. There's always writing them ...
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l