Well, at first it can *seem to go either way -- someone might come off as brash and blatant -- feeling like they have to swing a sword around, and then they calm down. This obviously wasnt the case, and his "edits" had about as much to do with politics as the "homomorph" (?) guy did on Hephaestos's pages last night. :)
Its good not to jump to conlusions either way, but his very first edit, moving Israel to "Zionist entity" warranted an immediate ban, regardless of any attempts to be neutral. -S-
It might be helpful -- though it is hard to say -- if someone who considers themselves generally or overwhelmingly pro-Palestinian but NPOV could write to this person explaining NPOV and what not, and explaining that contributions like that are just going to be deleted, and that a more effective way to help the cause is to contribute materials that is simple and factual and uncontroversial.
One of the advantages of NPOV is that all of us believe fervently that everyone would agree with us if only they had all the facts. So no matter what your POV, if you *really* believe in it, you will agree that simply laying out the facts, warts and all, will be sufficient to convince.
--Jimbo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com