Ray Saintonge wrote:
This person needs a stern talking to. From his user page: under "modified pages" "Alternative medicine - I cleaned up this article. I removed the anti-bias and made it pro-alternative medicine."
under "Interests" "To get important natural health related information and definitions in an Internet accessible encyclopedia / dictionary."
It is clear that /his/her/its purpose is to inject their POV and remove that of others.
So he's trying to put his own spin on things. How is that so different from what most Wikipedians are trying to accomplish? Announcing areas of interest is pretty normal.
But doesn't that first one go pretty far beyond announcing an area of interest? We don't want articles to be "pro-alternative medicine" or "anti-alternative medicine".
Certainly, if he came across an anti-biased article, and made it more neutral, that's wonderful, not a problem at all. But if his intention is to make it pro-, hmmm, not really right, eh?
The second one, I agree, is a perfectly valid goal.
--Jimbo