Fwappler is (pick one), a suitable case for treatment, a troll, or the most ineffable individual in history. See [[User_Talk:Fwappler]] for data.
Tom Parmenter, in my 60s and still a crabby young grouch, Ortolan88
|From: tarquin tarquin@planetunreal.com |Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 20:10:54 +0000 | |Despite my reputation as a crabby old grouch (and me still in my 20s ... |), I do try and be nice to new users. |But with Fwappler I've got to that hair-tearing point. |Take a look at these pages: | |http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3APluralis_Majestatis |http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk%3AFwappler | |This person seems to completely misunderstand ANY attempt an explaining. |Axel has already picked out two of their contributions as possibly |crank-science. |Am I wasting my time? | |I mean, what ON EARTH do they mean by this exchange: | |Me: | > I removed "[[Phil Hartman|Bill McNeal]]" because it was a hidden link |I dind't understand. The reader sees one name but is taken to another. | |Fwappler: | | I understand now that if the reader "looks up" one name but is taken | to another, then the distinction for instance between "[[Phil | Hartman:acting as|Bill McNeal]]" and "[[time:portrayed | by|duration]]" appears almost irretrievably concealed. Surely We | wouldn't want /that/ -- thanks for the lesson. | |gah??? |