Fred Bauder wrote:
That is the position they took. But in practice their postion was that it was "their article". They assumed a veto power (as a group) on how the article was to be defined and what could be included in it.
It seemed a fairly sensible thing to me once I read about it. Fred, if someone came along and sais the article "Fish" should also mention "Saturn", we'd tell them it wasn't suitable. They might raise similar criticisms of "veto power"