On Wed, 30 May 2007, jayjg wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying. Under what circumstances would linking to WR or a similar site be beneficial to Wikipedia? Please give some specific examples, keeping in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the purpose of Talk: pages is to discuss article content, and that article content must comply with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]].
Talk pages must discuss article content, and article content must comply with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]], but it does not follow that talk pages must comply with [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. That's not a syllogism. The article content produced by talk page discussion must comply with those policies; but the talk page itself doesn't.
By your reasoning, if we decide that something is a reliable source and say so on the talk page, we need a reliable source for the claim that it's a reliable source.