On 4/17/07, Rich Holton richholton@gmail.com wrote:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 4/15/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:57:42 -0400, "Ron Ritzman" ritzman@gmail.com wrote:
Why are "keep" closes reviewable on DRV? It seems kind of silly since if someone really wants an article deleted, he can AFD it again. (and again and again and again)
It's a review of the process.
That's a common misunderstanding of deletion review, but it's incorrect if you take a moment to think about it. The process by which a good article is kept or a bad article is deleted doesn't matter. Only the result matters.
The end justifies the means?
It wouldn't justify disruption. But objections to an action because of the failure to dot some "i"s or cross some "t"s really aren't on.