On 7/26/07, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. And we get to say it sucks. Ain't free speech great?
Even though wikipedia has been soundly panned by Harlan Ellison, I can't help but refer you to his line about people not being entitled to their opinion, but rather being entitled to an *informed* opinion.
So far all the panning of metapedia has been based on pages that had obviously been inserted there with the purpose of disrupting the site. Saying it sucks because of such attempts to disrupt the site in question is hardly an informed opinion.
There may be crappy content on metapedia inserted there by its core contributor base, but I have yet to find any myself, and more to the point, none of the people who have expressed distaste at the site existing in the first place, have presented such either. Saying that one disagrees with the ideology of some group of people, is one thing, saying that what they write is without merit is a separate question.
Infact what I have found so far, though often brief, compares favourably to the content on _supposedly_ quality oriented citizendium on the neutrality scale.
-- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]