On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Carcharoth carcharothwp@googlemail.com wrote:
I might try and do a personalised listing at some point, bringing out the areas I'm interested in and slicing up the FA cake in a different way. Such as identifying the more "general" ones and the more "niche" ones, and the "specific" items such as games, films, books, events, and paintings (as opposed to genres, histories and stuff like that), and biographies and suchlike. But with so many articles, it's difficult to do that.
That would be interesting. I wonder if this could be something that could be integrated into the 1.0 rating scheme... another, parallel rating for "scope" or "generality". Naturally, any such determinations will be subjective, but so are article ratings and yet the semi-codified Stub-Start-C-B ratings tend to work out pretty well. It would be great to have the breakdown of general vs. specific articles not just for FAs, but for everything.
-Sage (User:Ragesoss)