Skander - wrote:
The "free content" thing is a foundation policy, which you obviously know. Don't you think that this is a violation thereof? ( http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy )
If you want to maintain discussions it would be easier on everyone if you avoided top-posting.
There is more than one way to to interpret policy, and in a sane and sensitive world, one examines all mitigating circumstances. By your own admission your French is not good enough to have read whatever discussions may have taken place in that language on the subject. I believe that the picture in question has been discussed before, and sensible people brought it back. Even if it is a violation, not every violation needs to be prosecuted.
Ec
2007/6/21, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net:
Skander - wrote:
This is really weird... My French is not so good, but it seems to say something along the lines of "this is a personal photograph of a user, and
is not intended for distribution or use in the encyclopaedia". Does the Foundation permit these things? WP should be freely reusable and is licensed
under the GFDL...
I see nothing wrong with the policy on fr:wp. One should not assume that other projects will interpret things in the same way as on your home project.