Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote: The language now reads, "When a Wikipedia administrator discovers an instance where a block was made without appropriate reference to the Wikipedia:Blocking policy, they may reverse the block but should post a note on the offending Wikipedia administrators talk page explaining why the block was reversed."
Rick wrote:
Still unacceptable. The Arbcom is still making policy which has not been agreed to by the wikipedia as a whole.
RickK
What do you see as being a policy change in this?
Administrators have always been able to reverse a block which was made without appropriate reference to the Blocking policy, because admins have always been able to reverse blocks for any reason at all.
If anything, Rick, I should think you would strongly support this language, because it *hints* (but doesn't say) that if a proper reason *is* given, then admins *may not* reverse a block. That is a policy that I suspect you would support, but it would be policy-making by the committee if they literally said it.
--Jimbo