On 03/04/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:29:50 -0600, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
No, we're not reproducing the contents of Top Gear in its entirety. Not even remotely close.
We are, however, listing the cool wall in its entirety. If we list the Top Ten singles chart in its entirety, we violate copyright. If we list all the number one hits, it has also been stated we violate that copyright.
That's interesting.
So it *is* OK to have a thousand and something articles that all state "this song was number one in the UK from (x) to (y)", but it *is not* OK to have a single article listing them all in chronological order?
And if that is the case, how does the succession box fit in?