On 5/24/06, abu hamza abuhamza1970@hotmail.com wrote:
here is an earlier example where it was already there cur) (last) 01:17, 13 May 2006 87.80.113.51
the reason why i felt it was relevant , was because in a discussion elsewhere off the wikipedia site it was mentioned (and wikipedia sourced). The conversation surrounded the scarcity of any references to harold shipmas past. I went to check and it had been removed. I put it back in. I then researched the issue. In fact it was the very first time i had signed into wikipedia.
On May 13, an anon added to the intro that Shipman was Jewish. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=52931256&a... You re-added it on May 13 as your second edit and your first since March. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=53056969&a... Another anon added it on May 15. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=53327520&a... You again on May 16, twice. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=53470294&a... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=53553735&a... You on May 17. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=53651143&a... You on May 18, twice. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=53819990&a... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_Shipman&diff=53826041&a...
Then you were blocked for 3RR elsewhere. You included no sources. You wrote in one edit summary that it had been mentioned during the Abu Hamza trial, but you didn't point out that it was Abu Hamza himself who had said it, and he hardly counts as reliable. You've still produced no reliable source. You still haven't explained why you felt it was relevant enough to include in the first sentence.
It looks to me as though it was mentioned on some anti-Semitic website, and a bunch of anon IPs, and you with an account you'd used only once before, decided to turn up and be bigoted and disruptive.
Sarah