On 8 March 2014 09:20, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 March 2014 22:04, Brian J Mingus brian.mingus@colorado.edu wrote:
The article should reinstated, a section concerning the unique nature of its notability should be added.
This argument doesn't seem to convince (though that does resemble reasonable popularity). The fourth AFD notes the problem in this case: really crappy sources. The sort of thing that would lead me to !vote "delete without prejudice".
linkto:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baader-Meinhof_phenomenon in Google shows that it hits Reddit and apparently 4chan a bit. Apparently StumbleUpon likes it too. This would account for the hit rates - it's an amusing thing people would like there to be a name for, c.f. "The Meaning Of Liff" - but still doesn't supply us with sufficient material to base a solid article on.
- d.