--- Slowking Man slowkingman@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 09:17 -0700, Cheney Shill wrote:
I.e., push "negativity" (any thing that disagrees with
your
POV) out of site or marginalize as if it's just
opinions,
such as under a criticism header near the end but not
so
near that it's visible from the bottom. Highlight the information that agrees with your POV. See Dick
Cheney,
Hummers, Alberto Gonzales, Halliburton, and extremism
like
the ABC Hypothesis and fetal pain.
So, would you say that Wikipedia articles on various politically-charged subjects have neutrality problems, or only articles on subjects which contradict your point of view?
Much like the consensus of colleges and professors, I'd say that I wouldn't trust a Wikipedia article as a reference. Let me know if that needs clarification.
I'd also say more than just politically charged. Politically charged sometimes helps the neutrality by getting more people to participate in otherwise ignored articles that benefit from large company's internal advertising budgets and spare time and PR companies shaping them as they see fit without critical review, much less educated peer review.
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=...