Thomas Dalton wrote:
Three people saying that they like an article is not "established consensus". Moreover, Tony's concerns show that there *isn't* a consensus that this article should be FA.
Three people saying they like an article *and no-one saying they don't* is consensus. Generally, it is only necessary to speak up if you disagree with something. Yes-men serve little purpose in consensus driven decision making.
To protect a consensus then it is important to make sure that one not advertise that opinions are being sought. ;-) I think that your definition of consensus is flexible enough to allow for the participation of yes-men when it suits your purposes.
There is a difference between consensus and unanimous assent. One person objecting, without discussion, does not destroy consensus.
Yes there is a difference. Whether a single objector destroys consensus depends on the circumstances.
Ec