On 4/6/07, Vee vee.be.me@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/D...
"
- *Strong oppose* per many of the above,
WP:OFFICEhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:OFFICEis the antithesis of consensus building http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CON, which is the heart of Wikipedia. Danny was the tool that implimented this vicious and unfeeling policy. He's made his decisions, and those decisions are inconsistent with adminship.
??? I think I just lost what little faith I had in the RfA system. How dare Danny stop us from getting sued!
Also, what's with the trend of writing 'strong', 'firm', etc before votes? Does it actually add more weight to your opinion?
While we're complaining about illogical votes, I found it incredibly odd for someone supporting to write "Danny = WP. WP = Danny." Perhaps it was just an ill-phrased comment, but I think it's dangerous to equate the project with any one person. Let's not go overboard, shall we?
Johnleemk