geni said:
Absolutely not. I'm trying to illustrate that it is technically easier for a group that has a specific need for bowdlerized content to filter existing unbowdlerized content than to require all editors to edit to yet another limitation of their expression,
Except that your demonstartion fails in that it would be very little effort to add the word sparrow to the spam blacklist
I don't see that it does. Editors would still use the word sparrow and end up having to think up some alternative that was close but not quite the same. We'd end up with a poorer encyclopedia, even if you had this simple technical fix (which doesn't exist for pictures in any case).