On 04/03/2008, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:40 PM, cohesion cohesion@sleepyhead.org wrote:
I personally don't think this extreme reading of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NFCC#10c is such a great idea, but it's been around for a while now.
Likewise. That page doesn't even make a link compulsory; all that's compulsory is the name of the article.
Even that requirement is relatively new.
Um January 2006 is relatively new? Image was uploaded after that date.