Perhaps I shouldn't have, but I came to the conclusion that I would be helping Wikipedia if I was bold and reinstated the article anyhow. Unfortunately good old RickK got in a right tizz about this. Rick and I have exchanged words that just about stay civil on our talk pages, and Theresa Knott helpfully suggested I come here to the mailing list (a kind of higher court than VfU if you will, and one arena more open to more philosophical/esoteric debates) to see if I want did was reasonable.
If you believe the article should be undeleted, then argue the case on Votes for Undeletion. Otherwise you're just joining the recent cadre of inclusionists who are prepared to violate consensus when it goes against them.
-- ambi