On 9/22/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
It's a tertiary source, like any encyclopedia should be. Most (all?) of their actual content so far is repackaged material from NIST, which I presume would be US government Public Domain. I'd call that a reasonable source cited properly.
- d.
If possible, we should probably cite NIST itself though. Seems smarter, one less filter...
Since it is CC-BY-SA, can we... ehm... "borrow" stuff from these articles? It wouldn't be very nice, but are there any legal issues associated with it?
--Oskar